These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 15222715

  • 1. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.
    Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15222715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M, Torget O, Vandevska-Radunovic V.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS, Lee RT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P, De Toffol L, Iacopini L.
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition.
    Cozza P, Marino A, Mucedero M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Apr; 26(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 15130043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC, Hughes T.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.
    Yüksel Coşkun E, Esenlik E.
    Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun 26; 26():e921401. PubMed ID: 32588836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
    Flores-Mir C, Barnett G, Higgins DW, Heo G, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec 26; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
    Siara-Olds NJ, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Bayirli B.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan 26; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug 26; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun 26; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov 26; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A cephalometric study of the skeletal and dento-alveolar effects of the modified Louisiana State University activator in Class II malocclusion.
    Kang Y, Franchi L, Manton DJ, Schneider PM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Apr 06; 40(2):164-175. PubMed ID: 29016763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Facial profile changes in early Class II correction with cervical headgear.
    Kirjavainen M, Hurmerinta K, Kirjavainen T.
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov 06; 77(6):960-7. PubMed ID: 18004917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics.
    Fogle LL, Southard KA, Southard TE, Casko JS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr 06; 125(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 15067261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.