These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
605 related items for PubMed ID: 15223684
1. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease. Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Pless T, Durup J, Mortensen MB. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS. Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model. Arguedas MR, Dupont AW, Wilcox CM. Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Meagher S, Yusoff I, Kennedy W, Martel M, Adam V, Barkun A. Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging. Ang TL, Teo EK, Fock KM. Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Oct 15; 26(8):1163-70. PubMed ID: 17894658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-session endosonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliopancreatic diseases is feasible, effective and cost beneficial. Gornals JB, Moreno R, Castellote J, Loras C, Barranco R, Catala I, Xiol X, Fabregat J, Corbella X. Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Jul 15; 45(7):578-83. PubMed ID: 23465682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies. Carlos RC, Scheiman JM, Hussain HK, Song JH, Francis IR, Fendrick AM. Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun 15; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. Domagk D, Wessling J, Reimer P, Hertel L, Poremba C, Senninger N, Heinecke A, Domschke W, Menzel J. Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep 15; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Owens GR, Shutz SM. Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb 15; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortensen MB. Endoscopy; 2003 Dec 15; 35(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 14648416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the next millennium. Devereaux CE, Binmoeller KF. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Jan 15; 10(1):117-33, vii. PubMed ID: 10618458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease. Sahai AV, Devonshire D, Yeoh KG, Kay C, Feldman D, Willner I, Farber J, Patel R, Tamasky PR, Cunningham JT, Trus T, Hawes RH, Cotton PB. Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul 15; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study. Pungpapong S, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Noh KW, Raimondo M. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan 15; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-minimization analysis of MRC versus ERCP for the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Talwalkar JA, Angulo P, Johnson CD, Petersen BT, Lindor KD. Hepatology; 2004 Jul 15; 40(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15239084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. Moon JH, Cho YD, Cha SW, Cheon YK, Ahn HC, Kim YS, Kim YS, Lee JS, Lee MS, Lee HK, Shim CS, Kim BS. Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May 15; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Modern imaging methods versus clinical assessment in the evaluation of hospital in-patients with suspected pancreatic disease. Rösch T, Schusdziarra V, Born P, Bautz W, Baumgartner M, Ulm K, Lorenz R, Allescher HD, Gerhardt P, Siewert JR, Classen M. Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Sep 15; 95(9):2261-70. PubMed ID: 11007227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MRCP-secretin test-guided management of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: long-term outcomes. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Curioni S, Zanello A, Masci E. Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun 15; 67(7):1028-34. PubMed ID: 18179795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective study to develop an algorithm for investigation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Jenkins JT, Williamson BW. ANZ J Surg; 2006 Nov 15; 76(11):977-80. PubMed ID: 17054546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography]. Basile L, Pezzoto C, Roubicek D, Tempra A, Laborda Molteni J. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000 Nov 15; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]