These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
400 related items for PubMed ID: 15223931
1. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine. Pflugmacher R, Schleicher P, Schaefer J, Scholz M, Ludwig K, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP, Kandziora F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul 01; 29(13):1413-9. PubMed ID: 15223931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Expandable cages: biomechanical comparison of different cages for ventral spondylodesis in the thoracolumbar spine]. Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Schaefer J, Schleicher P, Pflugmacher R, Eindorf T, Haas NP, Kandziora F. Chirurg; 2004 Jul 01; 75(7):694-701. PubMed ID: 15258751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the cervical spine. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Schaefer J, Scholz M, Ludwig K, Schleicher P, Haas NP. J Neurosurg; 2003 Jul 01; 99(1 Suppl):91-7. PubMed ID: 12859067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study. Huang P, Gupta MC, Sarigul-Klijn N, Hazelwood S. Spine J; 2006 Jul 01; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Schäfer J, Born C, Duda G, Haas NP, Mittlmeier T. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep 01; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies]. Reinhold M, Schmölz W, Canto F, Krappinger D, Blauth M, Knop C. Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr 01; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Pflugmacher R, Schleicher P, Gumnior S, Turan O, Scholz M, Eindorf T, Haas NP, Kandziora F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug 15; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex. Comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Blauth M. Eur Spine J; 2000 Dec 15; 9(6):472-85. PubMed ID: 11189915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Biomechanical stability with a new artificial vertebral body implant. 3-dimensional movement analysis of instrumented human vertebral segments]. Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Blauth M. Unfallchirurg; 2001 Oct 15; 104(10):984-97. PubMed ID: 11699309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical testing of the lumbar facet interference screw. Kandziora F, Schleicher P, Scholz M, Pflugmacher R, Eindorf T, Haas NP, Pavlov PW. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan 15; 30(2):E34-9. PubMed ID: 15644745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A new distractable implant for vertebral body replacement: biomechanical testing of four implants for the thoracolumbar spine. Reinhold M, Schmoelz W, Canto F, Krappinger D, Blauth M, Knop C. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct 15; 129(10):1375-82. PubMed ID: 19190924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study. Disch AC, Schaser KD, Melcher I, Luzzati A, Feraboli F, Schmoelz W. Eur Spine J; 2008 May 15; 17(5):715-25. PubMed ID: 18196295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability potential of spinal instrumentations in tumor vertebral body replacement surgery. Vahldiek MJ, Panjabi MM. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar 01; 23(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 9530785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, Pellegrino A, Vaccaro AR, Siegler S, Albert TJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb 15; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of personalized 3D printed versus standard expandable titanium vertebral body replacement implants in the mid-thoracic spine using entire rib cage specimens. Liebsch C, Aleinikov V, Kerimbayev T, Akshulakov S, Kocak T, Vogt M, Jansen JU, Wilke HJ. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug 01; 78():105070. PubMed ID: 32531440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation. An HS, Lim TH, You JW, Hong JH, Eck J, McGrady L. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep 15; 20(18):1979-83. PubMed ID: 8578371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical properties of threaded inserts for lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Tencer AF, Hampton D, Eddy S. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Nov 15; 20(22):2408-14. PubMed ID: 8578391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine. Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, Lee WE, Volkov A, Vrionis FD. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb 15; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Bhatia NN, Lee KH, Bui CN, Luna M, Wahba GM, Lee TQ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan 15; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]