These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry after clear and yellow intraocular lens implantation. Ueda T, Ota T, Yukawa E, Hara Y. Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Nov; 142(5):856-8. PubMed ID: 17056369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma. Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects. Mastropasqua L, Brusini P, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Di Antonio L, Zeppieri MW, Parisi L. J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group. Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing. Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A, Neville S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1569-71. PubMed ID: 16299131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cataract surgery with intraocular lens implant on frequency doubling perimetry. Arvind H, George R, Baskaran M, Raju P, Ramesh SV, Paul PG, Vijaya L. Curr Eye Res; 2005 Feb; 30(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 15814470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M. J Glaucoma; 2008 Feb; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation. Parikh R, Muliyil J, George R, Bhat S, Thomas R. Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]