These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


208 related items for PubMed ID: 1523944

  • 1. Heart valve replacement--a report of 8- to 17-year follow-up.
    Kimura M, Kitasato K, Kamatani M.
    Igaku Kenkyu; 1992 Apr; 62(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 1523944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS, Fisher EB, Finkelmeier B, DeBoer A, Sanders JH, Moran JM, Michaelis LL.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Cagigas JC, Echevarria JR, Carrion MF, Revuelta JM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR, Allen P, Miyagishima RT, Gerein AN, Munro AI, Burr LH, Tyers GF.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T, Eishi K, Nakano S, Kobayashi J, Sasako Y, Isobe F, Kosakai Y, Kito Y, Kawashima Y.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Janusz MT, Chaitman BR, Tyers FO, Miyagishima RT.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 6381888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
    Kawachi Y, Tanaka J, Tominaga R, Kinoshita K, Tokunaga K.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Thiene G, Guerra F, Mazzucco A, Valente M, Talenti E, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, DeSmet JM, Danielson GK, Pluth JR, Puga FJ.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Long-term evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis].
    Takahara Y, Sudou Y, Murayama H, Nakamura T.
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 43(8):1097-102. PubMed ID: 7594841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years).
    Gallo I, Ruiz B, Duran CM.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
    Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT, Burr LH, Lichtenstein SV, Fradet GJ, Janusz MT.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I, Lip GY, Mukundan S, Rosin MD.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to eight years.
    Munro AI, Jamieson WR, Tyers GF, Burr LH.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 8000606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
    Joyce LD, Nelson RM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Early and late results of St. Jude Medical prosthesis in aortic and mitral portion].
    Kuboyama I, Sese A, Masaki H, Kohda Y, Ueno Y, Imoto H.
    Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1989 Aug; 9(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 9301945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb 28; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.