These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

737 related items for PubMed ID: 15248881

  • 21. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Moles DR.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Aug; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R, Rappelli G, Camaioni E, Cattani M, Meyer JM, Belser UC.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The influence of abutment angulation on screw loosening of implants in the anterior maxilla.
    Ha CY, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Choi JH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Feb; 26(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 21365037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
    Urdaneta RA, Marincola M, Weed M, Chuang SK.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
    Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Resistance of ITI implant connectors to multivectorial fatigue load application.
    Wiskott HW, Pavone AF, Scherrer SS, Renevey RR, Belser UC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 17(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15686095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
    Turkyilmaz I, Avci M, Kuran S, Ozbek EN.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF, Kang B, Lang LA, Razzoog ME.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A, Lee H, Geminiani A, Ercoli C, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
    Cho HW, Dong JK, Jin TH, Oh SC, Lee HH, Lee JW.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Feb; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.
    Khraisat A, Baqain ZH, Smadi L, Nomura S, Miyakawa O, Elnasser Z.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 8(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16774595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Waldenberger O, Piehslinger E.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007 Feb; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
    Quek HC, Tan KB, Nicholls JI.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Feb; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: a human cadaver study.
    Akkocaoglu M, Uysal S, Tekdemir I, Akca K, Cehreli MC.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 15777330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.
    Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 Apr; 15(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 10960985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Setchell DJ, Moles DR.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.