These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

427 related items for PubMed ID: 15248884

  • 1. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
    Iplikçioğlu H, Akça K, Cehreli MC, Sahin S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Aug; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE, Cury PR, Sendyk WR, Sendyk C.
    J Oral Implantol; 2008 Aug; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
    Canay S, Akça K.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Jun; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X, Zhu XH, Liao SH, Zhang XH, Chen H.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M, Eckert SE, Zobitz M, An KN.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Jul; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A, Bal BT, Karakoca S, Aydın C, Yılmaz H, Sarısoy S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Jul; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K, Simsek B, Erkmen E, Eser A.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B, Erkmen E, Yilmaz D, Eser A.
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Eser A, özden AU.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Sahin S.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF, Kang B, Lang LA, Razzoog ME.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
    Eser A, Tonuk E, Akca K, Cehreli MC.
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL, Chen CS, Hsu ML.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Jan; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, Hsu ML.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Dec; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ.
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
    Meriç G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Eser A, Ozden AU.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.