These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

356 related items for PubMed ID: 15250864

  • 1. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ, Shorofsky SR, Peters RW, Gold MR.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ, Farasat M, Kirk MM, Shorofsky SR, Peters RW, Gold MR.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR, Shorofsky SR, Bouhouch R, Joy RA, Kirby DS, Osman AF, Rashba EJ.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
    Lubiński A, Lewicka-Nowak E, Zienciuk A, Królak T, Kempa M, Pazdyga A, Raczak G, Swiatecka G.
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
    Schulte B, Sperzel J, Carlsson J, Schwarz T, Ehrlich W, Pitschner HF, Neuzner J.
    Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.
    Cooklin M, Olsovsky MR, Brockman RG, Shorofsky SR, Gold MR.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 10440146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Examination of a middle cardiac vein defibrillation coil as stand-alone anode, auxiliary anode, and bystander electrode in a transvenous defibrillation circuit.
    Paisey JR, Yue AM, Bessoule F, Allen S, Roberts PR, Morgan JM.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 27(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15305957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR, Olsovsky MR, DeGroot PJ, Cuello C, Shorofsky SR.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intraoperative comparison of a subthreshold test pulse with the standard high-energy shock approach for the measurement of defibrillation lead impedance.
    Schuchert A, Winter J, Binner L, Kühl M, Meinertz T, Reliance Investigators.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 16426402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR, Foster AH, Shorofsky SR.
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov 01; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.
    Keane D, Aweh N, Hynes B, Sheahan RG, Cripps T, Bashir Y, Zaidi A, Fahy G, Lowe M, Doherty P, Kroll MK.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May 01; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models.
    Mocanu D, Kettenbach J, Sweeney MO, Kikinis R, Kenknight BH, Eisenberg SR.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May 01; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.
    Benser ME, Walcott GP, Killingsworth CR, Girouard SD, Morris MM, Ideker RE.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug 01; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 11513449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.