These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


633 related items for PubMed ID: 15253184

  • 1. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
    Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
    Truong PT, Abnousi F, Yong CM, Hayashi A, Runkel JA, Phillips T, Olivotto IA.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
    van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.
    Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 17230080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J.
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan 01; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
    Goei H, van der Vlies CH, Tuinebreijer WE, van Zuijlen PPM, Middelkoop E, van Baar ME.
    Burns; 2017 Jun 01; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.
    Chae JK, Kim JH, Kim EJ, Park K.
    Ann Dermatol; 2016 Oct 01; 28(5):615-623. PubMed ID: 27746642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of remote burn scar evaluation via live video-conferencing technology.
    Cai LZ, Caceres M, Dangol MK, Nakarmi K, Rai SM, Chang J, Gibran NS, Pham TN.
    Burns; 2024 Apr 01; 50(3):781-788. PubMed ID: 27931764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis.
    DeJong HM, Phillips M, Edgar DW, Wood FM.
    Burns; 2017 Feb 01; 43(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 27576936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
    Forbes-Duchart L, Marshall S, Strock A, Cooper JE.
    J Burn Care Res; 2007 Feb 01; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.