These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 15261126

  • 21. Adenosine-induced ST segment depression with normal perfusion.
    Hage FG, Heo J, Iskandrian AE.
    Cardiol J; 2009; 16(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 19387958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion.
    Salerno M, Beller GA.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):412-24. PubMed ID: 19808630
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Exercise myocardial perfusion stress testing in children with Kawasaki disease.
    Lim CW, Ho KT, Quek SC.
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2006 Sep; 42(7-8):419-22. PubMed ID: 16898878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion with a spin-labeling technique: preliminary results in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Wacker CM, Fidler F, Dueren C, Hirn S, Jakob PM, Ertl G, Haase A, Bauer WR.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Nov; 18(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 14579398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Patel RN, Arteaga RB, Mandawat MK, Thornton JW, Robinson VJ.
    South Med J; 2007 Oct; 100(10):1006-14; quiz 1004. PubMed ID: 17943047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Comparison of adenosine magnetic resonance perfusion imaging with invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Kirschbaum SW, Springeling T, Rossi A, Duckers E, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Regar E, de Feyter PJ, van Geuns RJ.
    Int J Cardiol; 2011 Feb 17; 147(1):184-6. PubMed ID: 21190740
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Assessment of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography at rest and with stress: an emerging technology.
    Laskar R, Grayburn PA.
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2000 Feb 17; 43(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 11153511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Regadenoson: a new myocardial stress agent.
    Al Jaroudi W, Iskandrian AE.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Sep 22; 54(13):1123-30. PubMed ID: 19761931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Pharmacologic radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Navare SM, Kapetanopoulos A, Heller GV.
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2003 Jan 22; 5(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 12493156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The central role of the nurse in process improvement relating to pharmacologic stress testing.
    Coats NP, Baranyay J.
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2012 Jan 22; 27(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 21760522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Current methods of pharmacologic stress testing and the potential advantages of new agents.
    Botvinick EH.
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2009 Mar 22; 37(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 19258260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.