These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 15276671

  • 1. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Robinson BK.
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
    Nourski KV, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Jeng FC.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
    Xu Y, Collins LM.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparing neural response telemetry amplitude growth functions with loudness growth functions: preliminary results.
    Lai WK, Dillier N.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):42S-45S. PubMed ID: 17496644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB, Klis SF, Grolman W.
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.