These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 15276671

  • 21. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A, Peter O, Baumann U.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug 15; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Simulation of the electrically stimulated cochlear neuron: modeling adaptation to trains of electric pulses.
    Woo J, Miller CA, Abbas PJ.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May 15; 56(5):1348-59. PubMed ID: 19473930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep 15; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver SK.
    Med Prog Technol; 1997 Sep 15; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A, Zhang JS, Vischer MW, Pelizzone M, Rouiller EM.
    Audiology; 1998 Sep 15; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug 15; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effect of neural adaptation and degeneration on pulse-train ECAPs: A model study.
    van Gendt MJ, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun 15; 377():167-178. PubMed ID: 30947041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul 15; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan 15; 247(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 19068227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation.
    Mino H, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Abbas PJ.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan 15; 51(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 14723489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb 15; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A, Charasse B, Collet L, Killian M, Müller-Deile J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Feb 15; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Babalian AL, Ryugo DK, Rouiller EM.
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec 15; 153(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 12955378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [An approach for proper recording of the unit discharge in auditory nerve and inferior colliculus].
    Pan T, Cao KL, Wang ZZ.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Oct 15; 23(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 12905867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct 15; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug 15; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.
    Hu N, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Nourski KV, Jeng FC, Abkes BA, Nichols JM.
    Hear Res; 2003 Nov 15; 185(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 14599695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Encoding of information into neural spike trains in an auditory nerve fiber model with electric stimuli in the presence of a pseudospontaneous activity.
    Mino H.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar 15; 54(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 17355047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Prediction and control of neural responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation.
    Campbell LJ, Sly DJ, O'Leary SJ.
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr 15; 9(2):026023. PubMed ID: 22419164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A, Baumann U.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar 30; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.