These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 1527759

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
    Baker PJ, Setchell DJ, Tredwin CJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Current applications of computerized occlusal analysis in dental medicine.
    Kerstein RB.
    Gen Dent; 2001 Jun; 49(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 12017798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computer-aided evaluation of occlusal load in complete dentures.
    Boening KW, Walter MH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 1507098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of changes in articulator settings on generated occlusal tracings. Part II: Immediate side shift, intercondylar distance, and rear and top wall settings.
    Price RB, Kolling JN, Clayton JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 2056457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Computerized occlusal analysis: an evaluation of the sensors.
    Harvey WL, Hatch RA, Osborne JW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 2033554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A force reproduction analysis of two recording sensors of a computerized occlusal analysis system.
    Kerstein RB, Lowe M, Harty M, Radke J.
    Cranio; 2006 Jan; 24(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 16541841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity.
    Saraçoğlu A, Ozpinar B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):522-6. PubMed ID: 12474003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
    Hicks ST, Wood DP.
    Angle Orthod; 1996 Nov; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: influence of strip thickness and operator experience.
    Carossa S, Lojacono A, Schierano G, Pera P.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Nov; 13(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11203632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Simulation of dental collisions and occlusal dynamics in the virtual environment.
    Stavness IK, Hannam AG, Tobias DL, Zhang X.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 26685912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.