These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

283 related items for PubMed ID: 15291030

  • 1. A biomechanical comparison of three surgical approaches in bilateral subaxial cervical facet dislocation.
    Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, Park J, Kim DH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Jul; 1(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15291030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of graft size on spinal instability with anterior cervical plate fixation following in vitro flexion-distraction injuries.
    Yao R, McLachlin SD, Rasoulinejad P, Gurr KR, Siddiqi F, Dunning CE, Bailey CS.
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 26282105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison: stability of lateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared with anterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lower lumbar spine.
    Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, Park J, Kim DH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Jan; 2(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 15658128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of the impact of various facet joint lesions on the primary stability of anterior plate fixation in cervical dislocation injuries: a cadaver study: Laboratory investigation.
    Oberkircher L, Born S, Struewer J, Bliemel C, Buecking B, Wack C, Bergmann M, Ruchholtz S, Krüger A.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):634-9. PubMed ID: 25014498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O, Ghanayem AJ, Zindrick MR, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Hadjipavlou A, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 01; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC, Hafez MA, Cunningham B, Serhan H, Welch WC.
    Spine J; 2008 Jan 01; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, Lee WE, Volkov A, Vrionis FD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb 01; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB, Murovic JA, Cho BY, Lim TJ, Park J.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun 01; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
    Dong JW, Feng F, Zhao WD, Rong LM, Liu XM.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May 01; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.
    Spine J; 2007 May 01; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M, Eleraky M, Johnson WM, Aghayev K, Tran ND, Vrionis FD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun 01; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
    Park J, Scheer JK, Lim TJ, Deviren V, Ames CP.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May 01; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Galler RM, Dogan S, Fifield MS, Bozkus H, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May 15; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro flexibility of the cervical spine after ventral uncoforaminotomy. Laboratory investigation.
    Schmieder K, Kettner A, Brenke C, Harders A, Pechlivanis I, Wilke HJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Nov 15; 7(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 17977196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation.
    Mihara H, Cheng BC, David SM, Ohnari K, Zdeblick TA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug 01; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K, Doulgeris JJ, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Eleraky M, Lee WE, Vrionis FD.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Jan 01; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.