These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


112 related items for PubMed ID: 1529137

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors.
    Martin CJ, Hunter S.
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1196-205. PubMed ID: 7874418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP, Eger H.
    Radiography; 1985 Dec; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H, Xu XW, Hoffmann KR, Giger ML, Yoshimura H, Doi K, Carlin M, Kano A, Yao L, Abe K.
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic].
    Dölken W, Chowanetz W, Horwitz AE, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Lackner K.
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. System for digital acquisition of gastrointestinal images.
    Rowlands JA, Hynes DM, Edmonds EW.
    Med Phys; 1989 Jan; 16(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 2770629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
    Ludwig K, Diederich S, Wormanns D, Link TM, Lenzen H, Heindel W.
    Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S.
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Colonic contrast enema in digital luminescent radiography (DLR) and conventional x-ray technic].
    Krug B, Steinbrich W, Lorenz R, Glathe S, Dietlein M, Schirrmeister J.
    Rofo; 1990 Feb; 152(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 2155442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Dual-film cassette technique for studying the effect of radiographic image quality on diagnostic accuracy.
    Higashida Y, Doi K, Lehr JL, MacMahon H.
    Med Phys; 1984 Feb; 11(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 6503880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Smeets P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Feb; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Chang CL, Chee PW, Mathews JF.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA.
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M, Sumida I, Ideguchi T, Kawaji Y, Himuro K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Jan; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.