These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

643 related items for PubMed ID: 15295370

  • 1. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
    Guinn DA, Davies JK, Jones RO, Sullivan L, Wolf D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG, Reid KJ, Treaster MR, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Lu GC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the effect of extra-amniotic normal saline infusion alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the induction of labor.
    Kashanian M, Fekrat M, Naghghash S, Ansari NS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Feb; 34(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 18226128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening.
    Sharami SH, Milani F, Zahiri Z, Mansour-Ghanaei F.
    Med Sci Monit; 2005 Aug; 11(8):CR381-6. PubMed ID: 16049380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion.
    Karjane NW, Brock EL, Walsh SW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):234-9. PubMed ID: 16449106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ.
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB, Albuquerque RM, Cecatti JG.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor.
    Mazhar SB, Imran R, Alam K.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 12814527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Rouben D, Arias F.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
    Gagnon J, Corlin T, Berghella V, Hoffman MK, Sciscione A, Marie PS, Schoen CN.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Savage K, Lincoln T, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pettker CM, Pocock SB, Smok DP, Lee SM, Devine PC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 18515515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, Yeomans ER.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, Ben Arie A, Brown D, Hagay ZJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1632-6. PubMed ID: 15547534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Extra-amniotic saline infusion increases cesarean risk versus other induction methods and spontaneous labor.
    Levey KA, Arslan AA, Funai EF.
    Am J Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):435-8. PubMed ID: 17001554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
    Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Gelisen O, Dilbaz B, Ozturk N, Haberal A.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.