These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

94 related items for PubMed ID: 1530468

  • 1. CT and MRI scanning. Specialised imaging techniques.
    Crowe BL, Hailey DM.
    Aust Fam Physician; 1992 Apr; 21(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 1530468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value.
    Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC.
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008 Apr; 27(6):1467-78. PubMed ID: 18997202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L, Albrechtsson U, Höjgård S, Norgren L, Larsson EM.
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Use of rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hydrocephalus in children.
    Ashley WW, McKinstry RC, Leonard JR, Smyth MD, Lee BC, Park TS.
    J Neurosurg; 2005 Aug; 103(2 Suppl):124-30. PubMed ID: 16370277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation.
    Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 112(2 Pt 1):333-40. PubMed ID: 18669732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Value and importance of magnetic resonance tomography].
    Schmidt F.
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1997 Jul; 91(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9340200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Magnetic resonance and computed tomography compared in the staging of rhinosinusal neoplasms. A cost-effectiveness evaluation].
    Maroldi R, Farina D, Battaglia G, Maculotti P, Chiesa A.
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 8628933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Costs, charges, and revenues for hospital diagnostic imaging procedures: differences by modality and hospital characteristics.
    Sistrom CL, McKay NL.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 17411868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Use of computerized tomography. A neurologist's reflections].
    Tjørstad K.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Apr 10; 112(10):1328-30. PubMed ID: 1579920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The new imaging technics: theoretical principles, limitations and some ideas on costs].
    Marsault C, Héran F, Brugières P, Le Bras F, Castrec-Carpo A.
    Rev Prat; 1989 Mar 16; 39(9):733-42. PubMed ID: 2660235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The mid-field MRI center: 1990's answer to the continuing crisis in healthcare costs.
    Placone R.
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Oct 16; 9(10):55, 57, 59-62. PubMed ID: 10107645
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Asymmetric hearing loss: toward cost-effective diagnosis.
    Raber E, Dort JC, Sevick R, Winkelaar R.
    J Otolaryngol; 1997 Apr 16; 26(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 9106082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
    Schmidt GP, Kramer H, Reiser MF, Glaser C.
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun 16; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Consider hidden IT costs when purchasing an MRI or CT scanner.
    Khorasani R.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Aug 16; 5(8):935-6. PubMed ID: 18657791
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.
    Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep 16; 6(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 19720356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments.
    Ginde AA, Foianini A, Renner DM, Valley M, Camargo CA.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Aug 16; 15(8):780-3. PubMed ID: 18783491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Trends in diagnostic imaging utilization in a university hospital in Turkey.
    Semin S, Demiral Y, Dicle O.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006 Aug 16; 22(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 16984689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines.
    Blachar A, Tal S, Mandel A, Novikov I, Polliack G, Sosna J, Freedman Y, Copel L, Shemer J.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov 16; 3(11):851-9. PubMed ID: 17412184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Diagnostic imaging during pregnancy].
    Siegmann KC, Heuschmid M, Claussen CD.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Apr 16; 134(14):686-9; discussion 690. PubMed ID: 19319769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. When should abdominal magnetic resonance imaging be used?
    Neto JA, Elazzazzi M, Altun E, Semelka RC.
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jun 16; 6(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 18550003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.