These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


302 related items for PubMed ID: 15317189

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. An evaluation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and p30 determinations for the identification of semen on postcoital vaginal swabs.
    Stubbings NA, Newall PJ.
    J Forensic Sci; 1985 Jul; 30(3):604-14. PubMed ID: 2411845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Diagnostic accuracy of an initial azoospermic reading compared with results of post-centrifugation semen analysis after vasectomy.
    Steward B, Hays M, Sokal D.
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2119-23. PubMed ID: 18804227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Sperm identification--acid phosphatase test.
    Schiff AF.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1975 Nov; 21(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 1152636
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Prostate-specific antigen in vaginal fluid after exposure to known amounts of semen and after condom use: comparison of self-collected and nurse-collected samples.
    Bahamondes L, Diaz J, Marchi NM, Castro S, Villarroel M, Macaluso M.
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Nov; 23(11):2444-51. PubMed ID: 18664473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Detection of semen in stains on material evidences by quantitative immunofluorescence test].
    Sidorov VL, Maiatskaia MV, Liubimov IuA, Babakhanian RV.
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2000 Nov; 43(4):29-30. PubMed ID: 10961131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Identification of semen in 500 patients seen because of rape.
    Dahlke MB, Cooke C, Cunnane M, Chawla J, Lau P.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1977 Dec; 68(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 602911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Developmental validation of RSID™-Semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen.
    Old J, Schweers BA, Boonlayangoor PW, Fischer B, Miller KW, Reich K.
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):489-99. PubMed ID: 22211796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Follow-up on the Berg acid phosphatase test.
    Schiff AF.
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1998 Mar; 19(1):67-8. PubMed ID: 9539395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A comparison of methods used in the UK and Ireland for the extraction and detection of semen on swabs and cloth samples.
    Allard JE, Baird A, Davidson G, Jones S, Lewis J, McKenna L, Weston C, Scrimger D, Teppett G.
    Sci Justice; 2007 Dec; 47(4):160-7. PubMed ID: 18229757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. PSA doubling time as a predictive factor on repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Shimbo M, Tomioka S, Sasaki M, Shima T, Suzuki N, Murakami S, Nakatsu H, Shimazaki J.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Nov; 39(11):727-31. PubMed ID: 19674994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.