These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

278 related items for PubMed ID: 15330796

  • 1. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS, Bartlett KH, Brauer M, Stephens GM, Black WA, Teschke K.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.
    Lee KS, Teschke K, Brauer M, Bartlett KH.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 15330797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.
    Saldanha R, Manno M, Saleh M, Ewaze JO, Scott JA.
    Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS, Heikkinen MS, Hazi Y, Gao H, Peters P, Lippmann M.
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J, Chen B, Rao C.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of standard and modified sampling heads for the International PBI Surface Air System bioaerosol samplers.
    Jensen PA.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Mar; 56(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 7717271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M, Mainelis G.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C, Slagley J, Lohaus J, Escamilla E, Bliss C, Semler D, Felker D, Smith D, Ott D.
    J Emerg Manag; 2014 Jul; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.
    Méheust D, Gangneux JP, Cann PL.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013 Jul; 10(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 23799861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P, Simon X, Wrobel R, Kauffer E, Witschger O.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of the aerosolization potential for fungal spores in moldy homes.
    Sivasubramani SK, Niemeier RT, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 15500633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K.
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov 15; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H, Veillette M, Bilodeau GJ, Duchaine C.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec 01; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.