These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


348 related items for PubMed ID: 15341796

  • 1. The effects of hippocampal lesions on learning, memory, and reward expectancies.
    Savage LM, Buzzetti RA, Ramirez DR.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 Sep; 82(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 15341796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hippocampal lesions impair performance on a conditional delayed matching and non-matching to position task in the rat.
    Sloan HL, Döbrössy M, Dunnett SB.
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Aug 10; 171(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 16697059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Double dissociation between hippocampal and prefrontal lesions on an operant delayed matching task and a water maze reference memory task.
    Sloan HL, Good M, Dunnett SB.
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jul 15; 171(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 16677723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The role of the GABA(A) agonist muscimol on memory performance: reward contingencies determine the nature of the deficit.
    Ramirez DR, Buzzetti RA, Savage LM.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Nov 15; 84(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 16087366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Memory enhancement in aged rats: the differential outcomes effect.
    Savage LM, Pitkin SR, Careri JM.
    Dev Psychobiol; 1999 Dec 15; 35(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 10573571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Inhibition of adult hippocampal neurogenesis disrupts contextual learning but spares spatial working memory, long-term conditional rule retention and spatial reversal.
    Hernández-Rabaza V, Llorens-Martín M, Velázquez-Sánchez C, Ferragud A, Arcusa A, Gumus HG, Gómez-Pinedo U, Pérez-Villalba A, Roselló J, Trejo JL, Barcia JA, Canales JJ.
    Neuroscience; 2009 Mar 03; 159(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 19138728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Relational memory for object identity and spatial location in rats with lesions of perirhinal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus.
    Moses SN, Cole C, Ryan JD.
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 May 30; 65(6):501-12. PubMed ID: 15862922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Thalamic and hippocampal mechanisms in spatial navigation: a dissociation between brain mechanisms for learning how versus learning where to navigate.
    Cain DP, Boon F, Corcoran ME.
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun 30; 170(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 16569442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bilateral striatal lesions impair retention of an operant test of short-term memory.
    Döbrössy MD, Svendsen CN, Dunnett SB.
    Brain Res Bull; 1996 Jun 30; 41(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 8886385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The role of the hippocampus in trace conditioning: temporal discontinuity or task difficulty?
    Beylin AV, Gandhi CC, Wood GE, Talk AC, Matzel LD, Shors TJ.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2001 Nov 30; 76(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 11726247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Lesions of the dorsolateral or dorsomedial striatum impair performance of a previously acquired simple discrimination task.
    Featherstone RE, McDonald RJ.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Nov 30; 84(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 16165379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Consequences of serial cortical, hippocampal, and thalamic lesions and of different lengths of overtraining on the acquisition and retention of learning tasks.
    Markowitsch HJ, Kessler J, Streicher M.
    Behav Neurosci; 1985 Apr 30; 99(2):233-56. PubMed ID: 3843710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Improving conditional discrimination learning and memory in five-year-old children: differential outcomes effect using different types of reinforcement.
    Martínez L, Estévez AF, Fuentes LJ, Overmier JB.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug 30; 62(8):1617-30. PubMed ID: 19214832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Memory for magnitude of reinforcement: dissociation between the amygdala and hippocampus.
    Kesner RP, Williams JM.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1995 Nov 30; 64(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 8564377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retrograde amnesia and memory reactivation in rats with ibotenate lesions to the hippocampus or subiculum.
    Bolhuis JJ, Stewart CA, Forrest EM.
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 May 30; 47(2):129-50. PubMed ID: 8052726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dissociating space and trace in dorsal and ventral hippocampus.
    Czerniawski J, Yoon T, Otto T.
    Hippocampus; 2009 Jan 30; 19(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 18651617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On the hippocampus and learned conditional responding: effects of aspiration versus ibotenate lesions.
    Jarrard LE, Davidson TL.
    Hippocampus; 1991 Jan 30; 1(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 1669340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Parallel processing across neural systems: implications for a multiple memory system hypothesis.
    Mizumori SJ, Yeshenko O, Gill KM, Davis DM.
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 Nov 30; 82(3):278-98. PubMed ID: 15464410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The perirhinal cortex of the rat is necessary for spatial memory retention long after but not soon after learning.
    Ramos JM, Vaquero JM.
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep 15; 86(1-2):118-27. PubMed ID: 16098545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Retrograde amnesia: neither partial nor complete hippocampal lesions in rats result in preferential sparing of remote spatial memory, even after reminding.
    Martin SJ, de Hoz L, Morris RG.
    Neuropsychologia; 2005 Sep 15; 43(4):609-24. PubMed ID: 15716151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.