These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

751 related items for PubMed ID: 15346748

  • 1. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Feb; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Jun; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Jun; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Mar; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, Verhoef DR, Lepe X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC, Dixon DL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Oct; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Oct; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Monzavi A, Momen-Heravi F.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.