These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 15349873

  • 1. Hemispheric mediation of spatial attention: pseudoneglect after callosal stroke.
    Wolk DA, Coslett HB.
    Ann Neurol; 2004 Sep; 56(3):434-6. PubMed ID: 15349873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Peripersonal spatial attention in children with spina bifida: associations between horizontal and vertical line bisection and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, midbrain, and posterior cortex.
    Dennis M, Edelstein K, Frederick J, Copeland K, Francis D, Blaser SE, Kramer LA, Drake JM, Brandt M, Hetherington R, Fletcher JM.
    Neuropsychologia; 2005 Sep; 43(14):2000-10. PubMed ID: 15893777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Developmental changes in line bisection: a result of callosal maturation?
    Hausmann M, Waldie KE, Corballis MC.
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Jan; 17(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 12597084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.
    McCourt ME, Shpaner M, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ.
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 18485672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bare hands and attention: evidence for a tactile representation of the human body.
    Coslett HB, Lie E.
    Neuropsychologia; 2004 Jul; 42(14):1865-76. PubMed ID: 15381016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF, Forster B.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effects of focal and global attentional systems on spatial biases.
    Powers RM, Roth HL, Heilman KM.
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15963382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
    Richard C, Rousseaux M, Honoré J.
    Neuropsychologia; 2005 Aug; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Lateralization and interhemispheric integration of directed attention].
    Ishiai S.
    Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 2001 Dec; 41(12):1128-30. PubMed ID: 12235816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: the influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention.
    Neely K, Binsted G, Heath M.
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 15629221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL, Darling S, Malvaso C, Della Sala S.
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.