These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

230 related items for PubMed ID: 15350321

  • 1. Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast for following visual fields in prepubertal idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
    Stiebel-Kalish H, Lusky M, Yassur Y, Kalish Y, Shuper A, Erlich R, Lubman S, Snir M.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1673-5. PubMed ID: 15350321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children.
    Blumenthal EZ, Haddad A, Horani A, Anteby I.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Converting to SITA-standard from full-threshold visual field testing in the follow-up phase of a clinical trial.
    Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Motyka BM, Niziol LM, Mills RP, Lichter PR.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2755-9. PubMed ID: 16043847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population.
    Akar Y, Yilmaz A, Yucel I.
    Ophthalmologica; 2008 Aug; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.
    Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ, Taguri A, Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spileers W.
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001 Jun; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Schuman JS.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM, Macrae ME, Tan LL, Minns RA.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Oct; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS, Yang SJ, Kim S, Chung J, Kim ST, Tchah H.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Measurement precision in a series of visual fields acquired by the standard and fast versions of the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm: analysis of large-scale data from clinics.
    Saunders LJ, Russell RA, Crabb DP.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 25340390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.