These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
136 related items for PubMed ID: 15351559
1. Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model. Lukasewycz S, Hoffman N, Botnaru A, Deka PM, Monga M. Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):435-8; discussion 438. PubMed ID: 15351559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic evaluation of stone basket dimensions. Monga M, Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson JK. Urology; 2004 Jun; 63(6):1042-4. PubMed ID: 15183944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Radial dilation force of tipless and helical stone baskets. Hendlin K, Lee C, Anderson JK, Monga M. J Endourol; 2004 Dec; 18(10):946-7. PubMed ID: 15801359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tipless Nitinol Stone Baskets: Comparison of Penetration Force, Radial Dilation Force, Opening Dynamics, and Deflection. Patel N, Akhavein A, Hinck B, Jain R, Monga M. Urology; 2017 May; 103():256-260. PubMed ID: 28104422 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of small diameter stone baskets in an in vitro caliceal and ureteral model. Korman E, Hendlin K, Chotikawanich E, Monga M. J Endourol; 2011 Jan; 25(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20977371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of a new tipless nitinol stone basket and comparison with an existing flat-wire basket. Honey RJ. J Endourol; 1998 Dec; 12(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 9895257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Ahmed M, Pedro RN, Kieley S, Akornor JW, Durfee WK, Monga M. Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):976-80. PubMed ID: 19394493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Basket design as a factor in retention and release of calculi in vitro. Zeltser IS, Bagley DH. J Endourol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 17444783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrieval capabilities of different stone basket designs in vitro. el-Gabry EA, Bagley DH. J Endourol; 1999 May; 13(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 10405911 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative investigations on the retrieval capabilities of various baskets and graspers in four ex vivo models. Ptashnyk T, Cueva-Martinez A, Michel MS, Alken P, Köhrmann KU. Eur Urol; 2002 Apr; 41(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 12074812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval and releasing capabilities of stone-basket designs in vitro. Chenven ES, Bagley DH. J Endourol; 2005 Mar; 19(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 15798419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Controllable stone baskets can capture the elusive ureteral stone. Rutner AB. Urol Clin North Am; 1990 Feb; 17(1):81-2. PubMed ID: 2305526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Preclinical Testing of a Combination Stone Basket and Ureteral Balloon to Extract Ureteral Stones. Massoudi R, Metzner TJ, Bonneau B, Ngo TC, Shinghal R, Leppert JT. J Endourol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):96-99. PubMed ID: 29216731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Stone Cone: a device that prevents ureteral stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy]. Rodríguez García N, Fernández González I, Pascual Mateo C, Chiva Robles V, Luján Galán M, Llanes González L, Berenguer Sánchez A. Arch Esp Urol; 2005 May; 58(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 15989097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]