These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

422 related items for PubMed ID: 15371317

  • 1. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The accuracy of 3D-CT volume rendering for craniofacial linear measurements].
    Liu DX, Wang CL, Liu L, Dong ZY, Ke HF, Yu ZY.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Oct; 15(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 17348228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT.
    Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti MG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 18230391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
    Olszewski R, Frison L, Wisniewski M, Denis JM, Vynckier S, Cosnard G, Zech F, Reychler H.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R, Reychler H, Cosnard G, Denis JM, Vynckier S, Zech F.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants.
    Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 12087438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 10895633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Preoperative accuracy of selective laser sintering (SLS) in craniofacial 3D modeling: comparison with patient CT data].
    Kaim AH, Kirsch EC, Alder P, Bucher P, Hammer B.
    Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 19253203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification.
    Rocha Sdos S, Ramos DL, Cavalcanti Mde G.
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003 Jul; 17(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12908055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quantitative CT analysis of the glabellar and anterior nasal spine regions for the placement of implants for nasal prosthesis retention.
    Santos RN, Perrella A, Carvalho JC, Cavalcanti MG.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Jun; 23(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 18700366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S, Vikraman B, Chithranjan A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of surface and volume rendering in 3D-CT of facial fractures.
    Rodt T, Bartling SO, Zajaczek JE, Vafa MA, Kapapa T, Majdani O, Krauss JK, Zumkeller M, Matthies H, Becker H, Kaminsky J.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 16798916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A, Albarakati S, Baysal A, Uysal T, Kula K.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS, Jung S, Park HJ, Oh HK, Ryu SY, Cho JH, Lee JS, Yoon SJ, Kim MS, Shin HK.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images.
    Yitschaky O, Redlich M, Abed Y, Faerman M, Casap N, Hiller N.
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 20936949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro.
    Cavalcanti MG, Haller JW, Vannier MW.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 57(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 10368094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.