These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 15377098

  • 1. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
    Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS.
    Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
    Chakraborty DP.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Aug; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.
    Chakraborty DP.
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1554-66. PubMed ID: 19000872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
    Chakraborty DP, Winter LH.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC.
    Zheng B, Chakraborty DP, Rockette HE, Maitz GS, Gur D.
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1031-4. PubMed ID: 15895587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G, Ferruzzi K, Pierotti L, Vianello Vos C, Berardi P, Bergamini C.
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.
    Chakraborty D, Yoon HJ, Mello-Thoms C.
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17178361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST, Kim DH, Ro YM.
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
    Zanca F, Hillis SL, Claus F, Van Ongeval C, Celis V, Provoost V, Yoon HJ, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
    Khurd P, Liu B, Gindi G.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
    Wunderlich A, Abbey CK.
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
    Chakraborty DP, Yoon HJ.
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.