These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


252 related items for PubMed ID: 15383971

  • 1. [Fully automatic detection and quantification of emphysema on thin section MD-CT of the chest by a new and dedicated software].
    Achenbach T, Weinheimer O, Buschsieweke C, Heussel CP, Thelen M, Kauczor HU.
    Rofo; 2004 Oct; 176(10):1409-15. PubMed ID: 15383971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Quantification of pulmonary emphysema in multislice-CT using different software tools].
    Heussel CP, Achenbach T, Buschsieweke C, Kuhnigk J, Weinheimer O, Hammer G, Düber C, Kauczor HU.
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):987-98. PubMed ID: 17021978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fully Automated Pulmonary Lobar Segmentation: Influence of Different Prototype Software Programs onto Quantitative Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.
    Lim HJ, Weinheimer O, Wielpütz MO, Dinkel J, Hielscher T, Gompelmann D, Kauczor HU, Heussel CP.
    PLoS One; 2016 Oct; 11(3):e0151498. PubMed ID: 27029047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative analysis of emphysema in 3D using MDCT: influence of different reconstruction algorithms.
    Ley-Zaporozhan J, Ley S, Weinheimer O, Iliyushenko S, Erdugan S, Eberhardt R, Fuxa A, Mews J, Kauczor HU.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 17499951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Improved correlation between CT emphysema quantification and pulmonary function test by density correction of volumetric CT data based on air and aortic density.
    Kim SS, Seo JB, Kim N, Chae EJ, Lee YK, Oh YM, Lee SD.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22613510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Paired inspiratory/expiratory volumetric thin-slice CT scan for emphysema analysis: comparison of different quantitative evaluations and pulmonary function test.
    Zaporozhan J, Ley S, Eberhardt R, Weinheimer O, Iliyushenko S, Herth F, Kauczor HU.
    Chest; 2005 Nov; 128(5):3212-20. PubMed ID: 16304264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Repeated low-dose computed tomography in current and former smokers for quantification of emphysema.
    McGregor A, Roberts HC, Dong Z, Menezes R, Kauczor HU, Weinheimer O, Heussel CP.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Nov; 34(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 21084912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Does HRCT-emphysema index represent the entire lung?].
    Achenbach T, Buschsieweke C, Gerhards A, Gast K, Heussel CP, Thelen M.
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):655-9. PubMed ID: 15871080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contrast enhanced CT-scans are not comparable to non-enhanced scans in emphysema quantification.
    Heussel CP, Kappes J, Hantusch R, Hartlieb S, Weinheimer O, Kauczor HU, Eberhardt R.
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 19376661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Semi-automated scoring of pulmonary emphysema from X-ray CT: trainee reproducibility and accuracy.
    Owrangi AM, Entwistle B, Lu A, Chiu J, Hussain N, Etemad-Rezai R, Parraga G.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e734-41. PubMed ID: 23957938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.