These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

359 related items for PubMed ID: 15385651

  • 1. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
    Bloche MG.
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep 23; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
    Mariner WK.
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep 23; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
    Erb CT, Rich RF.
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan 13; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Legal liability, denial of benefits and managed care.
    Empey CS, Cwiek M.
    Mich Health Hosp; 1999 Jan 13; 35(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 10621029
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
    Zinberg JM.
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan 13; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15651122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Do we still need a federal patients' bill of rights?
    Law SA.
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002 Jan 13; 3(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 12825425
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act.
    Hansen E.
    Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov 13; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Finance issue brief: Consumer grievance procedures: internal and independent appeals: year end report-2003.
    MacEachern L.
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec 31; ():1-43. PubMed ID: 14969268
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.
    Rosenbaum S, Teitelbaum J.
    Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Apr 31; (8):1-15. PubMed ID: 12426709
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Bipartisan Patient Protection Act: greater liability on managed care plans.
    Mayers UW.
    Ann Health Law; 2003 Apr 31; 12(2):341-65, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12856463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The circuitous journey to the Patients' Bill of Rights: winners and losers.
    Reece S.
    Albany Law Rev; 2003 Apr 31; 65(1):17-95. PubMed ID: 11949702
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Recent developments in health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance case law.
    Hasman JJ, Chittenden WA, Doolin EG.
    Tort Insur Law J; 2002 Apr 31; 37(2):471-520. PubMed ID: 11917929
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Upon further review. 'External review' of medical claim denials is now the law of the land nearly nationwide. But the system has its fans and foes.
    Benko LB.
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb 07; 35(6):28-31, 35. PubMed ID: 15730203
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.