These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 15389173

  • 1. [Clinical study with angiography system using a flat panel detecter].
    Ichida T, Okusako K, Yokoyama K, Shougaki M, Ogawa T, Kawahata H, Nasu T, Hosogai M, Okuyama K, Hatagawa M.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Aug; 60(8):1143-52. PubMed ID: 15389173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [An experience of the clinical study with angiography system using a Flat Panel Detector].
    Okusako K, Shogaki M, Yokoyama K, Ogawa T, Tanaka K, Ichida T, Kishimoto K, Hatagawa M, Okuyama K, Kudoh H, Tanaka S, Nakamura K, Ikeda S, Suzuki K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Aug; 22(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 12766271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 3D digital subtraction angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of flat panel detector with conventional image intensifier TV system using a vascular phantom.
    Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Ohnari N, Hatakeyama Y, Moriya J, Oda N, Nishino K, Miyamoto W.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 May; 28(5):839-43. PubMed ID: 17494653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience.
    Hatakeyama Y, Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Ohnari N, Moriya J, Oda N, Nishino K, Miyamoto W.
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):2594-602. PubMed ID: 16708219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Difference in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector in peripheral angiography and the effect of BMI.
    Wiesinger B, Kirchner S, Blumenstock G, Herz K, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J.
    Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23196837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector.
    Spira D, Kirchner S, Blumenstock G, Herz K, Ketelsen D, Wiskirchen J, Wiesinger B.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26231951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A cone-beam volume CT using a 3D angiography system with a flat panel detector of direct conversion type: usefulness for superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy for head and neck tumors.
    Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Miyaguni Y, Moriya J, Ohnari N, Oda N, Nishino K, Miyamoto W.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Oct; 28(9):1783-8. PubMed ID: 17885248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.
    Racadio JM, Kashinkunti SR, Nachabe RA, Racadio JM, Johnson ND, Kukreja KU, Patel MN, Privitera MB, Hales JE, Abruzzo TA.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1491-501. PubMed ID: 23736781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Angiography: clinical evaluation and physical characteristics of FPD - the clinical impact caused by detector characteristics].
    Ichida T, Sasaki S, Shougaki M, Okusako K, Ogawa T, Yokoyama K, Sasagawa E, Nakajima M, Nakada R, Hosogai M, Tanaka S, Nakamura K.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Jun 20; 65(6):795-804. PubMed ID: 19602805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.
    Hatakeyama Y, Kakeda S, Ohnari N, Moriya J, Oda N, Nishino K, Miyamoto W, Korogi Y.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr 20; 28(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 17416814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products.
    Wiesinger B, Stütz A, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr 20; 198(4):946-54. PubMed ID: 22451565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.