These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 1542893

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the extracranial carotid arteries: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography.
    Mattle HP, Kent KC, Edelman RR, Atkinson DJ, Skillman JJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 1991 Jun; 13(6):838-44; discussion 844-5. PubMed ID: 2038105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Digital video subtraction angiography and duplex scanning in assessment of carotid artery disease: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Eikelboom BC, Ackerstaff RG, Ludwig JW, Moll FL, de Vries AR, Vermeulen FE.
    Surgery; 1983 Nov; 94(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 6356431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The comparative evaluation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance for carotid artery disease.
    Wilkerson DK, Keller I, Mezrich R, Schroder WB, Sebok D, Gronlund-Jacobs J, Conway R, Zatina MA.
    J Vasc Surg; 1991 Dec; 14(6):803-9; discussion 809-11. PubMed ID: 1960811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.
    Farmilo RW, Scott DJ, Cole SE, Jeans WD, Horrocks M.
    Br J Surg; 1990 Apr; 77(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 2187560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK, Nesbit GM, Wesbey GE, Richardson D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography.
    Cumming MJ, Morrow IM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):517-23. PubMed ID: 8079836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of duplex Doppler scanning with contrast angiography in carotid artery disease.
    Barry R, Nel CJ.
    S Afr Med J; 1987 Dec 19; 72(12):851-2. PubMed ID: 3424031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Post-endarterectomy carotid ultrasonic duplex scanning concordance with contrast angiography.
    Roederer GO, Langlois Y, Chan AT, Breslau P, Phillips DJ, Beach KW, Chikos PM, Strandness DE.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983 Dec 19; 9(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 6879826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US.
    Huston J, Lewis BD, Wiebers DO, Meyer FB, Riederer SJ, Weaver AL.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb 19; 186(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 8421731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of ulceration in the extracranial carotid artery with ultrasonography: a comparison with arteriography.
    Hansen F, Bergqvist D, Eriksson A, Maly P, Takolander R.
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1989 Oct 19; 3(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 2680611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.