These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The effective size of a metapopulation living in a heterogeneous patch network. Ovaskainen O. Am Nat; 2002 Nov; 160(5):612-28. PubMed ID: 18707512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I. Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 11878830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical and numerical tools for diffusion-based movement models. Ovaskainen O. Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Mar; 73(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 18199463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Generalizing Levins metapopulation model in explicit space: models of intermediate complexity. Roy M, Harding K, Holt RD. J Theor Biol; 2008 Nov 07; 255(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 18694763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stochastic models for mainland-island metapopulations in static and dynamic landscapes. Ross JV. Bull Math Biol; 2006 Feb 07; 68(2):417-49. PubMed ID: 16794938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scaling up the effects of inbreeding depression from individuals to metapopulations. Nonaka E, Sirén J, Somervuo P, Ruokolainen L, Ovaskainen O, Hanski I. J Anim Ecol; 2019 Aug 07; 88(8):1202-1214. PubMed ID: 31077598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial population structure of a specialist leaf-mining moth. Gripenberg S, Ovaskainen O, Morriën E, Roslin T. J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul 07; 77(4):757-67. PubMed ID: 18422557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A persistence criterion for metapopulations. Casagrandi R, Gatto M. Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Mar 07; 61(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 11969384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Allee-like effects in metapopulation dynamics. Zhou SR, Wang G. Math Biosci; 2004 May 07; 189(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 15051417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Metapopulation-level adaptation of insect host plant preference and extinction-colonization dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Hanski I, Heino M. Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Nov 07; 64(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 14522169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O. Nature; 2000 Apr 13; 404(6779):755-8. PubMed ID: 10783887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Metapopulation dynamics in a changing climate: Increasing spatial synchrony in weather conditions drives metapopulation synchrony of a butterfly inhabiting a fragmented landscape. Kahilainen A, van Nouhuys S, Schulz T, Saastamoinen M. Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Sep 13; 24(9):4316-4329. PubMed ID: 29682866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch dynamics and metapopulation theory: the case of successional species. Amarasekare P, Possingham H. J Theor Biol; 2001 Apr 07; 209(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 11312593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Density dependent behavior at habitat boundaries and the Allee effect. Cantrell RS, Cosner C. Bull Math Biol; 2007 Oct 07; 69(7):2339-60. PubMed ID: 17557188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic spatial structure in a butterfly metapopulation correlates better with past than present demographic structure. Orsini L, Corander J, Alasentie A, Hanski I. Mol Ecol; 2008 Jun 07; 17(11):2629-42. PubMed ID: 18466229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Heino M, Hanski I. Am Nat; 2001 May 07; 157(5):495-511. PubMed ID: 18707258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]