These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

188 related items for PubMed ID: 1548381

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays.
    Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M.
    J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 8425982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay.
    Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 7783020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays.
    van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P.
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8990682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements.
    Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 8463974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
    Rechenberg DK, Göhring TN, Attin T.
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of 1 fiber-reinforced composite and 2 all-ceramic inlay fixed partial denture systems.
    Monaco C, Krejci I, Bortolotto T, Perakis N, Ferrari M, Scotti R.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006 Feb; 19(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 16900821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Suzuki K, Watts DC.
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite.
    van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P.
    J Dent; 1994 Oct; 22(5):265-72. PubMed ID: 7962904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
    Bott B, Hannig M.
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L, Zaimoğlu A, Akören AC.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.