These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

413 related items for PubMed ID: 15486738

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mortality rate prediction by Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth POSSUM and Colorectal POSSUM and the development of new scoring systems in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.
    Ren L, Upadhyay AM, Wang L, Li L, Lu J, Fu W.
    Am J Surg; 2009 Jul; 198(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19246025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.
    Vather R, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Adegbola S, Hill AG.
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Sep; 76(9):812-6. PubMed ID: 16922904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection with POSSUM, Portsmouth POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM.
    Law WL, Lam CM, Lee YM.
    Br J Surg; 2006 Jan; 93(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 16288451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy.
    Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW.
    Br J Surg; 2003 Oct; 90(10):1280-4. PubMed ID: 14515300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
    Kumar P, Rodrigues GS.
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 Jan; 15(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 19130334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
    Tekkis PP, Kessaris N, Kocher HM, Poloniecki JD, Lyttle J, Windsor AC.
    Br J Surg; 2003 Mar; 90(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 12594670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Validation of risk assessment scoring systems for an audit of elective surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients: an audit.
    Wakabayashi H, Sano T, Yachida S, Okano K, Izuishi K, Suzuki Y.
    Int J Surg; 2007 Oct; 5(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 17462968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Validation of POSSUM scoring systems for audit of major hepatectomy.
    Lam CM, Fan ST, Yuen AW, Law WL, Poon K.
    Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 15048745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.