These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

396 related items for PubMed ID: 15487727

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
    Lekatou A, Metaxas V, Messaris G, Antzele P, Tzavellas G, Panayiotakis G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec 23; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Paulis LE, Lobbes MB, Lalji UC, Gelissen N, Bouwman RW, Wildberger JE, Jeukens CR.
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct 23; 50(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 26011823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF, Mertelmeier T.
    Rofo; 2009 Mar 23; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Yaffe M, Alm Carlsson G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul 07; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R, Raiano N, Raiano C, Maio F, Vallone P, Mattace Raso M, Setola SV, Granata V, Rubulotta MR, Barretta ML, Petrosino T, Petrillo A.
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May 07; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
    Asbeutah AM, Brindhaban A, AlMajran AA, Asbeutah SA.
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug 07; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.