These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

381 related items for PubMed ID: 15488903

  • 1. Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP.
    Holländer A, Corballis MC, Hamm JP.
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15488903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sex hormonal modulation of hemispheric asymmetries in the attentional blink.
    Holländer A, Hausmann M, Hamm JP, Corballis MC.
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 May; 11(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 15892902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The attentional blink within and across the hemispheres: Evidence from a patient with a complete section of the corpus callosum.
    Ptito A, Brisson B, Dell'Acqua R, Lassonde M, Jolicoeur P.
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19539687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Left visual-field advantage in the dual-stream RSVP task and reading-direction: a study in three nations.
    Smigasiewicz K, Shalgi S, Hsieh S, Möller F, Jaffe S, Chang CC, Verleger R.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2852-60. PubMed ID: 20546763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli.
    Lupien S, Lafrance MS, Lecours AR.
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J, Holmqvist K, Lindgren M.
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Skill and hemispheric specialization in detecting featural differences in visual images.
    Clancy SM, Hoyer WJ.
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):192-202. PubMed ID: 8442935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs.
    Verleger R, Śmigasiewicz K, Möller F.
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1096-106. PubMed ID: 21265863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR, Rozell CA, Kasper A, Bianco NE, Delliturri A.
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Split of attentional resources in human visual cortex.
    Morawetz C, Holz P, Baudewig J, Treue S, Dechent P.
    Vis Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 24(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 18093369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME, Wood AG.
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H, Tallus J, Hämäläinen H.
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG, Dobkins KR.
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM, Ogawa KH, Soltani M, Knight RT.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec 03; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study.
    Jiang Y, Han S.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun 03; 116(6):1444-54. PubMed ID: 15978507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The bilateral effect: callosal inhibition or intrahemispheric competition?
    Olk B, Hartje W.
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Apr 03; 45(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 11305876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A, Müller NG, Hagendorf H, Schira MM, Dick S, Fendrich RM, Brandt SA.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun 03; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.