These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 15490135

  • 21. Optimal and preferred eye landing positions in objects and scenes.
    Foulsham T, Kingstone A.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1707-28. PubMed ID: 23398283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Spatial scene representations formed by self-organizing learning in a hippocampal extension of the ventral visual system.
    Rolls ET, Tromans JM, Stringer SM.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2116-27. PubMed ID: 19046392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.
    Volcic R, van Rheede JJ, Postma A, Kappers AM.
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 18553074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects.
    Nabeta T, Kawahara J.
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16574587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Roughness perception of unfamiliar dot pattern textures.
    Eck J, Kaas AL, Mulders JL, Goebel R.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 23500111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. View combination: a generalization mechanism for visual recognition.
    Friedman A, Waller D, Thrash T, Greenauer N, Hodgson E.
    Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 21334606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effects of interference on recognition of haptic pictures in blindfolded sighted participants: the modality of representation of haptic information.
    Holtby RC, D'Angiulli A.
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 22251003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Static images of novel, moveable objects learned through touch activate visual area hMT+.
    Chan JS, Simões-Franklin C, Garavan H, Newell FN.
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan 15; 49(2):1708-16. PubMed ID: 19815082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Updating representations of learned scenes.
    Finlay CA, Motes MA, Kozhevnikov M.
    Psychol Res; 2007 May 15; 71(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 17051399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects?
    Lacey S, Campbell C, Sathian K.
    Perception; 2007 May 15; 36(10):1513-21. PubMed ID: 18265834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Development of visuo-haptic transfer for object recognition in typical preschool and school-aged children.
    Purpura G, Cioni G, Tinelli F.
    Child Neuropsychol; 2018 Jul 15; 24(5):657-670. PubMed ID: 28427295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.