These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 15490777

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions.
    Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 15490777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Mar; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
    Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S.
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS, Celik EU.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jun; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jun; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.
    Smales RJ, Ng KK.
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15762341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Dec; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of flexural load cycling on microleakage of extended root caries restorations.
    Minakuchi S, Munoz CA, Jessop N.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Dec; 30(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 15853110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.