These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


405 related items for PubMed ID: 15490780

  • 1. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
    Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
    Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH.
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of restorative techniques on fracture load of endodontically treated premolars.
    Bianchi E Silva AA, Ghiggi PC, Mota EG, Borges GA, Burnett LH, Spohr AM.
    Stomatologija; 2013 Jun; 15(4):123-8. PubMed ID: 24589635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V, Yakub SS, Kalburge J, Hiremath H, Chandurkar A.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Jun; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
    Salaverry A, Borges GA, Mota EG, Burnett Júnior LH, Spohr AM.
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.
    Deliperi S, Bardwell DN.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005 Dec; 17(6):369-78; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 16417833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P, Knezevic A.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB, Paranhos MP, Spohr AM, Oshima HM, Carlini B, Burnett LH.
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Effect of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement Base and Bulk-fill Resin Composite on Cuspal Deformation.
    Nguyen KV, Wong RH, Palamara J, Burrow MF.
    Oper Dent; 2016 May; 41(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 26509230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of mechanical loading on the cusp defection of premolars restored with direct and indirect techniques.
    Zamboni SC, Nogueira L, Bottino MA, Sobrinho LC, Valandro LF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan 01; 15(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24939269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E, Ozgunaltay G.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Jan 01; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations.
    Geiger S, Paikin L, Gorfil C, Gordon M.
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Feb 01; 39(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 18560642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
    Oskoee PA, Chaharom ME, Kimyai S, Oskoee JS, Varasteh S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan 01; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.