These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


83 related items for PubMed ID: 15491477

  • 1. An evaluation of algorithms designed to classify the results from frequency doubling perimetry.
    Müskens RP, Heeg GP, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 15491477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Frequency doubling perimetry screening mode compared to the full-threshold mode.
    Stoutenbeek R, Heeg GP, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 15491476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
    Heeg GP, Blanksma LJ, Hardus PL, Jansonius NM.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C, Takada S, Okuyama S, Arimura E, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma.
    Ferreras A, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pajarín AB, Mayoral F, Honrubia FM.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
    Li JJ, Xu L, Zhang RX, Sun XY, Yang H, Zou Y, Zhao JL.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields.
    Bengtsson B, Bizios D, Heijl A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3730-6. PubMed ID: 16186356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Oct; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y.
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.
    Bizios D, Heijl A, Bengtsson B.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17224745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Neural networks for visual field analysis: how do they compare with other algorithms?
    Lietman T, Eng J, Katz J, Quigley HA.
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Feb; 8(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 10084278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L, Brusini P, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Di Antonio L, Zeppieri MW, Parisi L.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.