These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

209 related items for PubMed ID: 1549669

  • 1. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT, Rice JJ, Beam CA, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J.
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H, Sanada S, Doi K, Giger M, Xu XW, Yin FF, Montner SM, Carlin M.
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Chang CL, Chee PW, Mathews JF.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Delong DM, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Investigation of low-contrast signal detection in computed radiography (CR)].
    Higashida Y, Matsumoto M, Yoshioka S, Takahashi M.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov 25; 49(11):1411-9. PubMed ID: 2602104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Smeets P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 25; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M, Nishikawa K, Kobayashi N, Farman AG, Kuroyanagi K.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb 25; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP.
    Bildgebung; 1991 Feb 25; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems.
    Braun M, Wilson BC.
    Radiology; 1982 Sep 25; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan 25; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP.
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep 25; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U, Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Scherlach C, Döhring W.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan 25; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Kitagawa H, Kuroyanagi K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul 25; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A, Sjöström D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul 25; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan 25; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.