These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


399 related items for PubMed ID: 15500631

  • 1. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR, Mainelis G, Yao M.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS, Heikkinen MS, Hazi Y, Gao H, Peters P, Lippmann M.
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bioaerosol sampling by a personal rotating cup sampler CIP 10-M.
    Görner P, Fabriès JF, Duquenne P, Witschger O, Wrobel R.
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16395458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M, Mainelis G.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K.
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov 15; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C, Slagley J, Lohaus J, Escamilla E, Bliss C, Semler D, Felker D, Smith D, Ott D.
    J Emerg Manag; 2014 Nov 15; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Integration of high volume portable aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and qPCR in monitoring bioaerosols.
    He Q, Yao M.
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Mar 15; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 21258725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O, Grinshpun SA, Fauvel S, Basso G.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun 15; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fungal spore source strength tester: laboratory evaluation of a new concept.
    Sivasubramani SK, Niemeier RT, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA.
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug 15; 329(1-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 15262159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC, Bowry A, Crook B, Stancliffe JD.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug 15; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Removal of viable bioaerosol particles with a low-efficiency HVAC filter enhanced by continuous emission of unipolar air ions.
    Huang R, Agranovski I, Pyankov O, Grinshpun S.
    Indoor Air; 2008 Apr 15; 18(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 18333990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.
    Yao M, Mainelis G.
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Jan 15; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 16912697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA, Todd WF, Davis GN, Scarpino PV.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct 15; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling.
    Lindsley WG, Schmechel D, Chen BT.
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Nov 15; 8(11):1136-42. PubMed ID: 17075620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS, Bartlett KH, Brauer M, Stephens GM, Black WA, Teschke K.
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct 15; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The adaptation of existing personal inhalable aerosol samplers for bioaerosol sampling.
    Kenny LC, Stancliffe JD, Crook B, Stagg S, Griffiths WD, Stewart IW, Futter SJ.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec 15; 59(12):831-41. PubMed ID: 9866164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
    Grinshpun SA, Adhikari A, Cho SH, Kim KY, Lee T, Reponen T.
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug 15; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D, Godish T.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb 15; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of standard and modified sampling heads for the International PBI Surface Air System bioaerosol samplers.
    Jensen PA.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Mar 15; 56(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 7717271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Development of a personal bioaerosol sampler based on a conical cyclone with recirculating liquid film.
    Tolchinsky AD, Sigaev VI, Sigaev GI, Varfolomeev AN, Zvyagina EV, Brasel T, Cheng YS.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Mar 15; 7(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 20017057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.