These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
500 related items for PubMed ID: 15504604
1. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex. Gabriel D, Veuillet E, Ragot R, Schwartz D, Ducorps A, Norena A, Durrant JD, Bonmartin A, Cotton F, Collet L. Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli. Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H. Neuropsychologia; 2004 Nov; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ross B, Herdman AT, Pantev C. Cereb Cortex; 2005 Dec; 15(12):2029-39. PubMed ID: 15772375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain. Tiitinen H, Mäkelä AM, Mäkinen V, May PJ, Alku P. BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct 15; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones. Fujioka T, Kakigi R, Gunji A, Takeshima Y. Neuroscience; 2002 Oct 15; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of pitch and pitch strength on an auditory-evoked N1m. Soeta Y, Nakagawa S. Neuroreport; 2008 May 07; 19(7):783-7. PubMed ID: 18418257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]