These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


284 related items for PubMed ID: 15506311

  • 1. The measurement of stenosis of the internal carotid artery: comparison of doppler ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography and the 3D CT volume rendering technique.
    Flis V, Tetickovic E, Breznik S, Stirn B, Matela J, Miksić K.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2004; 116 Suppl 2():51-5. PubMed ID: 15506311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [3D-CT angiography and duplex sonography compared to arteriography in carotid stenoses].
    Link J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Wesner F, Höpfner M, Schwarzenberg H, Heller M.
    Rofo; 1997 Jan; 166(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9072101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK, Hobson RW, Tofighi B, Kapadia I, Cuadra S, Jamil Z.
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
    Bozzao A, Floris R, Villani A, Varrucciu V, Baviera ME, Simonetti G.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: validation of Doppler/duplex ultrasound criteria and angiography against endarterectomy specimen.
    Eckstein HH, Winter R, Eichbaum M, Klemm K, Schumacher H, Dörfler A, Schulte K, Neuwirth A, Gross W, Schnabel P, Allenberg JR.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 21(4):301-10. PubMed ID: 11359329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Hyde DE, Fox AJ, Gulka I, Kalapos P, Lee DH, Pelz DM, Holdsworth DW.
    Stroke; 2004 Dec; 35(12):2776-81. PubMed ID: 15514196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Three-dimensional DSA imaging and 3-dimensional measurement of cross section for internal carotid artery stenosis].
    Iwai R, Tsumura K, Kuwayama N, Hirashima Y, Endo S.
    No To Shinkei; 2003 Aug; 55(8):661-7. PubMed ID: 13677299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measurement of carotid stenosis using duplex ultrasonography with a microconvex array transducer: a validation with cerebral angiography.
    Tateishi Y, Tsujino A, Hamabe J, Tasaki O, Morikawa M, Horie N, Hayashi K, Nagata I.
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013 Nov; 22(8):e360-5. PubMed ID: 23608369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex with digital subtraction angiography.
    Padayachee TS, Cox TC, Modaresi KB, Colchester AC, Taylor PR.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1997 Feb; 13(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 9091152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multidetector helical angio CT oblique reconstructions orthogonal to internal carotid artery for preoperative evaluation of stenosis. A prospective study of comparison with color Doppler US, digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative data.
    De Monti M, Ghilardi G, Caverni L, Ceriani L, Soldi S, Massaro F, Buchbut R, Gobatti D, Scorza R.
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Aug; 51(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 12900719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
    Netuka D, Belšán T, Broulíková K, Mandys V, Charvát F, Malík J, Coufalová L, Bradáč O, Ostrý S, Beneš V.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA.
    Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, Murata Y, Takahashi M, Suginohara K, Uemura S.
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 11719682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. B-flow and B-flow with 3D and SRI postprocessing before intervention and monitoring after stenting of the internal carotid artery.
    Jung EM, Kubale R, Clevert DA, Weskott HP, Prantl L, Herold T, Renz M, Rupp N, Tacke J.
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2007 Dec; 36(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17211060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, van der Graaf Y.
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD, Schnur C, Pfadenhauer K, Bruijnen H, Bohndorf K, Loeprecht H.
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Direct B-mode NASCET-style stenosis measurement and Doppler ultrasound as parameters for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Rotstein AH, Gibson RN, King PM.
    Australas Radiol; 2002 Mar; 46(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11966587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement.
    van Prehn J, Muhs BE, Pramanik B, Ollenschleger M, Rockman CB, Cayne NS, Adelman MA, Jacobowitz GR, Maldonado TS.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 36(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18585935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA, Kerkhoff H, Bakker J, Elgersma OE.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Wat J, Trivedi RA, Tang T, Howarth SP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.