These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 1550921

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP.
    Bildgebung; 1991 Oct; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M, Radeleff B, Kampschulte A, Daniels MD, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
    Itouji E, Kono M.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov 25; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D, Gray JE, Swensen SJ, Vrieze TJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar 25; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug 25; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G, von Boetticher H, Amling B, Herzog R.
    Rofo; 1995 Aug 25; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR, Gur D, Good B, Rockette H, Cooperstein LA, Feist JH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May 25; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.