These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems]. Schaefer-Prokop C, Uffmann M, Stadler A. Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [The AMBER thoracic imaging system in routine diagnosis]. Luska G, Rabold J, Herzog R, von Boetticher H. Radiologe; 1993 Jun; 33(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 8332732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. Kroft LJ, Geleijns J, Mertens BJ, Veldkamp WJ, Zonderland HM, de Roos A. Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study. Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T. J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The Kodak AMBER imaging system--a new approach to lung imaging]. von Volkmann T, Busch HP, Georgi M. Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Mar; 1(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 2039770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Lanhede B, Tylén U. Eur Radiol; 1999 Mar; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems. Kehler M, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Hochbergs P, Lindberg CG, Medin J, Nordström AJ, Sanfridsson J, Vojciechowski J. Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures. Lehnert T, Naguib NN, Wutzler S, Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Burkhard T, Schulz B, Larson MC, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ, Balzer JO. Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid]. Ciccotosto C, Storto ML, Guidotti A, Ferrante R, Bonomo L. Radiol Med; 1994 Jan; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination]. Freund M, Reuter M, Palmié S, Harder E, Hutzelmann A, Heller M. Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths]. Bergonzini R, Gallini R, Giugni U, Robecchi D, Amato M. Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients. Swensen SJ, Gray JE, Brown LR, Aughenbaugh GL, Harms GF, Stears J. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions]. Shimizu T, Yamamoto K, Ogura Y, Aratake K, Nakata Y, Saika Y, Sagami A, Ashina K, Sueyoshi K, Narabayashi I. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May 25; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging]. Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Sommer A, Georgi M. Rofo; 1991 Mar 25; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Digital radiography: optimization of chest radiographs using a modified exposure control]. Reichelt S, Oestmann JW, Prokop M, Hagemann G, Knüpfer W, Galanski M. Rofo; 1991 Feb 25; 154(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1847538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The value of the InSight HC asymmetric film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis]. Häussler MD, Lenzen H, Reckels C, Peters PE. Rofo; 1994 Mar 25; 160(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8136481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Interpretation of normal anatomic structures on chest radiography: comparison of Fuji computed radiography (FCR) 5501D with FCR 5000 and screen-film system. Nakashima K, Ashizawa K, Ochi M, Hashmi R, Hayashi K, Gotoh S, Honda S, Igarashi A, Komaki T. J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003 Mar 25; 4(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 12540822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Value of the AMBER system in interstitial lung changes]. Dammann F, Sokiranski R, Schäfer C, Brambs HJ, Claussen CD. Rofo; 1995 Aug 25; 163(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 7670027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography]. Herzog R, von Boetticher H, Luska G. Rofo; 1993 May 25; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]