These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
406 related items for PubMed ID: 15518933
1. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Donkers FC, van Boxtel GJ. Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 15518933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return. Prime DJ, Jolicoeur P. J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 18752398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task. Smith JL, Smith EA, Provost AL, Heathcote A. Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD. Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 14693011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks. Gajewski PD, Falkenstein M. Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory-induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: an event-related potential study. Yu F, Yuan J, Luo YJ. Neuroreport; 2009 Jan 07; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18978645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner. Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Inuggi A, Blasi V, Cursi M, Annovazzi P, Comi G, Falini A, Leocani L. Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul 07; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Kirmizi-Alsan E, Bayraktaroglu Z, Gurvit H, Keskin YH, Emre M, Demiralp T. Brain Res; 2006 Aug 09; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated. Ramautar JR, Kok A, Ridderinkhof KR. Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov 09; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict. Szmalec A, Verbruggen F, Vandierendonck A, De Baene W, Verguts T, Notebaert W. Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr 18; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ERP correlates of complex human decision making in a gambling paradigm: detection and resolution of conflict. Mennes M, Wouters H, van den Bergh B, Lagae L, Stiers P. Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep 18; 45(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18665870 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. Burle B, Vidal F, Tandonnet C, Hasbroucq T. Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov 18; 56(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 15518932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task. Kaiser S, Weiss O, Hill H, Markela-Lerenc J, Kiefer M, Weisbrod M. Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug 18; 61(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 16298004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]