These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

207 related items for PubMed ID: 15519347

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F.
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T, Doi H.
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E, Müller M, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T.
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements].
    Kliewe C, Souffrant R, Kluess D, Woernle C, Brökel K, Bader R.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Feb; 55(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20128745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Computer-based motion simulation of total hip prostheses with ceramic-on-ceramic wear couple. Analysis of implant design andorientation as influence parameters].
    Bader R, Steinhauser E, Gradinger R, Willmann G, Mittelmeier W.
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002 Feb; 140(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 12085297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R.
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH, Zurfluh B.
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cup safe zone and optimal stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with highly required range of motion.
    Habe Y, Hamada H, Uemura K, Takashima K, Ando W, Sugano N.
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun; 42(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 38084832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.