These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

110 related items for PubMed ID: 15541858

  • 1. Laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures or prolene meshes: a 3-year follow-up.
    Zullo F, Palomba S, Russo T, Sbano FM, Falbo A, Morelli M, Pellicano M, Mastrantonio P.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec 01; 117(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 15541858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
    Carey MP, Goh JT, Rosamilia A, Cornish A, Gordon I, Hawthorne G, Maher CF, Dwyer PL, Moran P, Gilmour DT.
    BJOG; 2006 Sep 01; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a short term urodynamic follow-up and a three-year questionnaire-study.
    Persson J, Bossmar T, Wølner-Hanssen P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 May 01; 79(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 10830770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study.
    Kjølhede P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug 01; 84(8):767-72. PubMed ID: 16026403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, Walters MD, Paraiso MF.
    BJOG; 2008 Jan 01; 115(2):219-25; discussion 225. PubMed ID: 18081602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M, Milsom I, Stjerndahl JH, Engh ME.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug 01; 84(8):773-9. PubMed ID: 16026404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up.
    Sharifiaghdas F, Mortazavi N.
    Med Princ Pract; 2008 Aug 01; 17(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 18408389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence.
    Das S.
    J Urol; 1998 Aug 01; 160(2):368-71. PubMed ID: 9679879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between two laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy.
    Palomba S, Russo T, Iuzzolino D, Cosco C, Noia R, Arduino B, Morelli M, Zullo F.
    Minerva Chir; 2002 Jun 01; 57(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 12029227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.