These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

100 related items for PubMed ID: 1555388

  • 21. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age.
    Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Monitoring of caries progression in permanent and primary posterior approximal enamel by bitewing radiography.
    Pitts NB.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1983 Aug; 11(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 6349915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.
    Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA.
    Caries Res; 1997 Aug; 31(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 9165195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Use of the ICDAS system and two fluorescence-based intraoral devices for examination of occlusal surfaces.
    Theocharopoulou A, Lagerweij MD, van Strijp AJ.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25793954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Approximal caries diagnosis in epidemiological studies: transillumination or bitewing radiographs?
    Obry-Musset AM, Cahen PM, Turlot JC, Frank RM.
    J Biol Buccale; 1988 Mar; 16(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3165088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience.
    Lazarchik DA, Firestone AR, Heaven TJ, Filler SJ, Lussi A.
    Caries Res; 1995 Mar; 29(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 8521436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E, Sener Y, Botsali MS.
    Pediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth.
    Lussi A, Francescut P.
    Caries Res; 2003 Mar; 37(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12566632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A, Kasraei S, Shokri E, Farhadian M, Hekmat B.
    Dent Med Probl; 2018 Mar; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth.
    Côrtes DF, Ekstrand KR, Elias-Boneta AR, Ellwood RP.
    Caries Res; 2000 Mar; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Matos R, Novaes TF, Braga MM, Siqueira WL, Duarte DA, Mendes FM.
    Caries Res; 2011 Mar; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.