These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

214 related items for PubMed ID: 15556664

  • 1. Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems.
    Chakeres DW, de Vocht F.
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005; 87(2-3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15556664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements.
    Chakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, Young DC.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Sep; 18(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 12938131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G, Perduri R, Murolo A.
    Med Lav; 2008 Sep; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8 T guideline: sodium imaging at 9.4 T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability.
    Atkinson IC, Renteria L, Burd H, Pliskin NH, Thulborn KR.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1222-7. PubMed ID: 17969172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
    Bralet MC, Navarre M, Eskenazi AM, Lucas-Ross M, Falissard B.
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Vital signs and cognitive function are not affected by 23-sodium and 17-oxygen magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 9.4 T.
    Atkinson IC, Sonstegaard R, Pliskin NH, Thulborn KR.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20578014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Occupational risk among magnetic resonance workers. Analysis of the literature].
    Magnavita N, Fileni A.
    Radiol Med; 1995 May; 89(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 7617908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
    Glover PM, Bowtell R.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan 21; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function.
    Schlamann M, Voigt MA, Maderwald S, Bitz AK, Kraff O, Ladd SC, Ladd ME, Forsting M, Wilhelm H.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May 21; 31(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 20432339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Telsa].
    Weikl A, Moshage W, Hentschel D, Schittenhelm R, Bachmann K.
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Sep 21; 78(9):578-86. PubMed ID: 2815912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Static magnetic fields: animal studies.
    Saunders R.
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2005 Sep 21; 87(2-3):225-39. PubMed ID: 15556661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.